Discuss issues affecting Malaysian youth !
Your 322 articles have prompted 4,403 responses.
By NGAI JIN TIK
Photo from The Star

The recent scandal involving a top police official is akin to a classic Hollywood cop movie.
Commercial Crimes Investigation Department (CCID) Director Comm Datuk Ramli Yusoff is being investigated by Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA). As it stands, Datuk Ramli Yusoff is subject to an ACA probe for allegedly not disclosing all his assets, which are worth about RM 27 million, according to The Star. These undeclared assets may include real estate and company bonds. In his statement however, Yusoff vehemently denied the accusations, further claiming that the ACA had violated Section 21 (4) of the ACA Act by exposing the nature of the investigation to the public.
He said he is being framed.
I find this dramatic turn of events disturbing. Nobody knows who the good guys are anymore. This incident further taints the image of our police force. They have once again become the butt of people’s jokes.
This sort of sensational story has both Malaysians and foreigners perturbed: Is Ramli Yusoff’s counter arguments valid? And how did ACA managed to gain access to the information that ultimately led to the investigation?
These are questions which are fundamental in determining ACA’s ability to conduct independent investigations.
One would do well to remember the high-profile investigation of ACA Director-General Datuk Seri Zulkipli Mat Noor for corruption not too long ago. The task of handling the investigation, ironically, fell into the hands of the Inspector-General (IGP) Tan Sri Musa Hassan.
How can we trust both the police force and ACA?
In an investigation where even the investigator’s transparency is under scrutiny, one wonders if justice will be served when Ramli Yusoff receives his verdict. And what if “appointed” judges had a hand in Ramli Yusoff’s case?
Juicy.
Here’s some food for thought: Why is government transparency and openness becoming more prominent these days? Is our country becoming more corrupt? Or could it be that certain parties are taking advantage of the situation for their personal interests? And why are there always more scandals close to the general election?
Malaysians are becoming more politically conscious due the scandals surfacing in the public service arena. And we have to continuously keep ourselves up to date with our country’s political landscape and think about how corruption affects all of us. Only then can we make informed choices during elections.
As for Ramli Yusoff and the other recent corruption scandals, we can only “trust” that our prime minister will clean up all the dirty politics.
I feel that his campaign against corruption is nothing but a farce.
As citizens, we may voice out against corruption via petitions and memorandums. But real and effective change can only happen if the top layers of government are serious about tackling corruption.
–
NGAI JIN TIK is a contributing writer for theCICAK.
Jin Tik is an A-levels student aspiring to study at a prestigious university abroad. A former state debater, he finds satisfaction in intellectual discussions. His favorite pastimes include playing football, golfing and reading.
If you liked this article, here are some related posts:
Does your comment encourage responsible, intelligent discussion?
All comments are moderated for impersonations and defamatory, racially, sexually and religiously offensive content.
By the way... since you're sharing your comments, get paid for it.
Subscribe via RSS
It’s not a question of whether you CAN trust them or not. It is more of whether you WANT to or not.
Was this a good comment?
WHAT’S HAPPENING ? THE BPR IS EMPOWERED TO CHECK ON THE POLICE & GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVES & SERVANTS PLUS THE PUBLIC AT WILL.
PREVIOUSLY THE EX-BPR DIRECTOR WAS HIMSELF CHARGED & INVESTIGATED BY THE POLICE. NOW THE BPR IS CHARGING THE POLICE TOP BRASS ???????
IT IS A VICIOUS CYCLES….. FOR THE POLITICIANS & TOP BRASS.
PREVIOUSLY ONLY THE LOW & INTERMEDIATE RANKING OFFICERS WERE CHARGED. UNDER “PAK LAH’ THE TOP BRASS ARE BEING CHARGED.. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THE PM IS BEGINNING TO WIN IN HIS QUEST TO GET RID OF THE
GRAFT…. BUT STILL THEY ARE SO MANY BIG FISH MANAGE TO EVADE THE NET…OR THE NET ITSELF HAPPENED TO BE LOOSE….
Was this a good comment?
Was just having a discussion with a co-worker on the word “golfing”….
There are a few things that I wish to bring up about this case against Ramli Yusoff, one of which it is not exactly wrong to be a cop with cash, if you can explain where it came from. In this case, he insists that it’s from land in Sabah.
Personally, I have no idea of the price of land in Sabah, but I’m guessing RM27 million worth of it is not exactly a small hectarage. The ACA is accusing him of not declaring this as part of his assets, and is giving him some time to do so.
Anyways, I would believe the evidence and arguments presented by both sides.
In this case, both sides are right, I guess. The property was undeclared as personally his. But it was not exactly his, seeing as how it belongs to a company where he and another person are co-owners. So, would he still have to declare it as his own, or the company’s?
I’m no lawyer, that’s for sure. But this seems to be the argument on his side, at least.
He has 30 days to explain himself, so I guess we’ll see how that turns out.
Like I said, trust the arguments on both sides, not the people who present them. If you find a flaw, call it out.
Was this a good comment?
It is a good development, really. When people start questioning and the government now cannot just sweep the bad things under the carpet.
Was this a good comment?