Israel’s Catch-22

By ANDREW LOH

Author’s warning: This article neither attempts to justify nor condemn the Israeli-Lebanon conflict, but is an extremely biased, personal perspective of the situation. Given the highly volatile sentiments surrounding it, this article will be “sensitive” for most.

Hezbollah is not made up of idiots. Its members are highly intelligent, calculating strategists. Its newest action has forced Israel into another Catch-22 situation.

First, Hezbollah kidnaps two Israeli soldiers. Israel has to do something. Do nothing and the government will fall. It’s simple psychology. You don’t retaliate, you lose face. You are weak. You get voted off.

Hezbollah: 1, Israel: 0.

I see that Israel has a few choices, with varying outcomes:

a) Israel can negotiate with Hezbollah and exchange a few thousand prisoners for two soldiers. Hezbollah wins and Israel loses face. Moreover, this will incite Hezbollah to launch MORE kidnappings to free MORE prisoners.

Israel set a precedent for this by agreeing to a similar exchange in 2004, when the bodies of three Israeli soldiers and a businessman were exchanged for 30 Lebanese and 400 Palestinian militants from Israeli prisons. Then at a mass rally, Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah warned that “Hezbollah would kidnap more Israelis to use as bargaining chips… to secure the release of Lebanese prisoners.”

Hezbollah: 2, Israel: 0.

b) Force some institution to pressure Hezbollah to return the soldiers. This will not happen, as Hezbollah listens to no one. Hezbollah hasn’t listened to the UN or the international community or its government to disarm, according to UN Security Council Resolution 1701. (Conversely, Israel doesn’t listen either.)

c) Israel can invade Lebanon to whack Hezbollah up. However, Hezbollah will still win, because:

i) Although the group might lose militarily, it will win politically - casualties from the Lebanese side will definitely outweigh Israeli civilian deaths, and the world will condemn Israel, yet again. Just read the papers.

Hezbollah: 3, Israel: 0

ii) People are nothing to Hezbollah, and everything to Israel. Hezbollah sees people as Arafat the Corrupt did - as martyrs, compulsory sacrifices, collateral damage, world sympathy bait. It doesn’t care how many people, Lebanese or Israeli, die. In fact, for Hezbollah, the more people perish the better, as the world will further condemn Israel.

For Israel, however, every death counts dearly. “The Israeli public is far more sensitive to casualties,” retired Israeli Col. Gal Luft said in a 2004 Washington Post article. “Thirty dead soldiers per year were enough to create public resistance to the [Lebanese] occupation and finally bring about withdrawal. In Israel everyone has a family member who is a soldier or knows one. Funerals are covered extensively… when a soldier dies, his pictures appear on the first page of major newspapers and on national television.”

Hezbollah: 4, Israel: 0.

iii) Hezbollah hides its weapons amongst civilians. Israel, of course, seeks to minimise civilian casualties but cannot because of this often-overlooked fact. Hezbollah, on the other hand, invites mortalities, because loss of life = political gain in Hezbollah’s dictionary. Do you really think Israel is that daft to kill civilians for fun?

In a New York Times article quoted in the New York Press, Jon Egeland, who is in charge of humanitarian affairs for the UN, accused Hezbollah of “cowardly blending” among women and children. He said, “I heard they were proud because they lost very few fighters and that it was the civilians bearing the brunt of this… I don’t think anyone should be proud of having many more children and women dead than armed men.”

Hezbollah: 5, Israel: 0

iv) Israel has to INVADE sovereign Lebanon to get Hezbollah, which is bad politics. Sure kena hentam one! What to do? Lebanon is so weak, so Hezbollah is grabbing them by the balls-lah!

“Hezbollah has created a ’state within a state’ in Lebanon and must be disarmed,” its country’s prime minister Fouad Siniora once said. Siniora said the Shiite militia had been doing the bidding of Syria and Iran, and could only be disarmed with the help of the international community.

After the destructive Lebanese Civil War, Hezbollah was the only faction to retain weapons during the subsequent Syrian occupation. It was under the control of the more powerful Syrian army. With the power vacuum created by Syria’s withdrawal, Hezbollah now reigns supreme in the South. The Lebanese military is small, poorly equipped, ill-disciplined, badly organised, and in no way ready to neutralise Hezbollah (Note: See this article for more information). In addition, 35 percent of its members are Shiite and are sympathetic towards the group.

Hezbollah: 6, Israel: 0

5) I think Hezbollah will batter down Israeli columns into a bloody guerrilla war, if the ceasefire doesn’t hold. Remember, every Israeli casualty inflicted is a horrendous loss to Israel, while Hezbollah just can’t wait to sacrifice more martyrs.

Hezbollah’s motto is: “You love life, we love death.” There is nothing, gushes Hezbollah’s patron Ahmadinejad, “more beautiful, holier or more eternal than the death of a martyr.” No mercy even for Israeli-Arabs, who bear the brunt of the missile attacks, martyrs they will all be. A glorious death!

What are you going to do to people who will not stop until you are wiped off the face of the earth?

What CAN you do?

Imagine if an Israeli PM said he wanted to wipe out the Palestinians from the face of the earth, to put it into perspective, okay.

Only some people can say things like that (wiping people off the face of the earth), start a war, and get away with it, and even be supported by 10 percent of the world’s population.

The irony is that Israel can win 100 brilliant, against-the-odds wars and still be insecure, destroyed forever if it loses just ONE war.

Israel is damned if it invades, and damned if it doesn’t. Israel is trapped by this ingenious, brilliant political manoeuvre by Hezbollah.

Given all these reasons, of course Israel doesn’t care what others think-lah!

And so Hezbollah is MOSTLY, if not SOLELY responsible for the destruction of Lebanon, for escalating every act of violence happening today in the war. The blame IS theirs. Stupid, brilliant, crazy, heartless Hezbollah.

If you want to point fingers, point them at Hezbollah.

Imagine if some military organisation in Brunei, hostile to Malaysia for years, kidnapped Malaysian soldiers. You’d be incensed and expect Malaysia to get them back, right? If the Bruneian army was useless and the organisation didn’t listen to anyone, the Malaysian government would then have a moral burden to get the soldiers back, by hook or by crook. Even if it meant decimating West Brunei, where this hypothetical organisation has its base, to make sure such attacks do not continue.

What went right for Hezbollah? Almost everything.

Before the attacks, the Lebanese people were demanding the disarmament of Hezbollah and piling up pressure on it. A 2004 study found most Christians (71 percent) were in favour of disarming Hizbullah, while generally Muslims (74 percent) were against it.

But because Israel foolishly played into the hands of Hezbollah by implementing collective punishment against Lebanon as a whole, the Lebanese people are now fully behind Hezbollah.

According to a current poll released by the Beirut Center for Research and Information, fully 87 percent of the Lebanese people support Hezbollah, a 29 percent rise from February’s numbers.

Now 80 percent of Christians support Hezbollah, along with 90 percent of Muslims. Fantastic news for Hezbollah because Israel managed to do something the organisation could never have done independently: unite Lebanon behind it! Yay!

Hezbollah is also gaining international credibility as the only Muslim organisation to have ever bloodied Israel’s nose. Before this, all the Arabs had done was lose. Pan-Islamic support, especially from Sunnis in American brown-nosing countries like Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, has been growing exponentially for Hezbollah. Some have even hailed Nasrallah as the new Gamel Abdel Nasser (former president of Egypt and famed Arab nationalist).

Popular support is turning against inactive, Malaysian-style all-talk-and-no-do governments and towards riding the Islamist hype of hard-hitting, Israel-humiliating Hezbollah. I believe that if the conflict goes on, you’ll see these people going to Lebanon to fight some more as jihadists, as some Indonesians have done.

Brilliant, brilliant Hezbollah.

World peace. *waves hand like the Queen*
-
ANDREW LOH is a staff writer for theCICAK.

He is a monstrously biased, rebellious 19-year-old who thinks that young people should be elected to Parliament instead of some incompetent, blundering, racist old fogey, and that Malaysian subtitlists should go for listening and language lessons. He is currently Undecided (yes, that’s possible) at Swarthmore College. Visit his site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

If you liked this article, here are some related posts:



 

Responses || Discussion || Debates || Commentaries

12 Comments so far. Post your own comment
View blog reactions
  1. Absolutely fabulous… I have not even thought of this in the slightest detail…

    Simply brilliant!

    Comment published by Miles on 21 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  2. Fantastic… It’s time we learn something from this event rather than argue who was right and who was wrong… Amen!

    Comment published by Adrian on 21 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  3. Hizbollah: 6, Israel: 0 Very interesting,

    Still Israel is back by USA.

    Israel has survived for more than 50 years as a nation after WWII or earlier if we dig deep into history.

    Right now Israel looks weak with current bickering and finger pointing, but it will come out of it stronger.

    If the oil price drops can Iran continue to support Hizbollah like it is currently doing.

    Just food for thought.

    Comment published by huZmid on 23 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  4. well this is very informative. big kudos!

    Comment published by azhan on 25 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  5. here i am thinking that hezbollah-israel fight was purely religious.

    but now, after reading this article,( plus noting the religion of the writer)it sunk on me that it is not the case.
    this was a fight for freedom. for sovereignety.
    i am surprised why this blatant act of colonialism has not get america jumping to be the world police as in most occasion.

    thank you, writer.
    for i’m no longer naive.

    Comment published by farah hanani on 26 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  6. agree with farah

    Comment published by azhan on 27 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  7. You raise some very valid points but you seem to have fallen for the trap of only having a memory that goes back 4 weeks.
    When you blame Hezbollah for starting the conflict, you conveniently forget that Israel was still holding Lebanese soil as a so called “Buffer Zone”. Lebanon was and still is at war with Israel long before Hezbollah fired rockets @ captured (not kidnapped) Israeli soldiers.

    Watch this video for a more complete account of the conflict:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wdwk1dp-uU

    Comment published by Luqman on 30 August 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  8. you are so brilliant. Hezbollah :6 and Isreali:0
    yet the war still wages on, huh and nobody knows why. but dude i totally agree with you calling Malaysian-style all-talk-and-no-do government. and some more their giving bonuses to the civil servant who do nothing except sit, chat, eat and get that belly piled up. huh… well a masterpiece i should say. two thumbs up!!!!

    Comment published by aini on 2 September 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  9. Let me just start off by saying that I don’t think either side is right in this conflict. There hasn’t been a side that’s blameless in a conflict for a long time. I have to admit that this is my first visit to this website. Considering that one of the missions of this website is to be “objective” and this article is the editor’s pick, I thought I’d say a few things. Your article is very biased, just like you admitted. Cherry-picking on articles that only support your views is, in my opinion, very unprofessional. I’m not going to list down all the articles to counter you points, although I do suggest searching for it in the www.counterpunch.com archives. The Malaysian government all-talk-and-no-do? Look, I know that our government is not the best in the world. I realise that our public service is not the most efficient either. But please watch your words and don’t blame everyone in the government of doing nothing. I have acquaintances who are in the public service and I know the sacrifices they make in getting their job done. Don’t think that only people in the private sector come home late at night after a long day at work. If you think working in the public sector is easy, or you can do better then them, then go ahead and do it. I dare you to sacrifice the better pay that you can get from multinational companies and apply for a job in the public sector. Bitching about it in a website won’t change a thing. If you want to change something, it’s best done from the inside-out. I’m also disgusted by how easy it is for some readers to be influenced just by this one article. I suggest that they explore the internet for other articles that give facts to counter those they find here. As my lecturer for Introduction to Politics used to say, “a way of seeing, is a way of not seeing”. Hence, broaden your mind and open yourself to more ideas. All the best.

    Comment published by Fadli on 4 September 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  10. Andrew Loh, are you forgetting about the thousands of political prisoners from Lebanon and Palestine that Israel has held without trial for the last 20 years?

    How can you say that Hezbollah started it by kidnapping 2 soldiers? That’s ridiculous. Do your history books only cover the last 3 months?

    Ahmadinejad never said he wanted to wipe Israel off the map. It is nothing but a mistranslation and propaganda designed to justify actions against Iran. People forget he was speaking Farsi and not English. See these articles:

    http://www.albionmonitor.com/0605a/iranmisquote.html
    http://www.canadiancontent.net/forums/archive/o_t/t_14921/ahmadinejad_never_said_wipe_isreal_off_the_map.html
    http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/jonathan_steele/2006/06/post_155.html

    You seem to talk with a biased view. You say Israel does not enjoy killing and Hezbollah does, yet the highest death toll lies on Israel’s head.

    Of course, your answer to this argument would be that Hezbollah loves those deaths because it increases popular support for them; but would you say the same about Israel or the IDF if more Israelis were killed?

    Comment published by M. Kris Khaira on 4 September 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

  11. andrew loh is just plain stupid if he cannot see that israel is a terrorist state. i do believe that people who do not understand a situation should not put forth their silly ideas with a couple of facts thrown in to validate their belief - yes you should not do that even on the internet. if israel hated death of civilians they would not have killed so many to save 2 soldiers.

    Comment published by khine on 18 September 2006.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  --1

  12. EVEN THOUGH I’M A MUSLIM BUT I’VE NEVER SUPPORT HEZBOLLAH. YOUR WRITING SEEM TO BE SO BIASE WHERE U SEE ISRAEL IS A VICTIM OF THE CURRENT SITUATION.
    WHAT I CAN SUGGEST TO U IS THAT LEARN THE HISTORY OF MIDDLE EAST, LEARN THE HISTORY OF THE THREE RELIIGION IE ISLAM, CHRISTIAN & JUDAISM, LEARN THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE AND HOW THEY EFFECT PEOPLE AROUND THEM, HOW THEY DEAL IN BUSINESS, WHAT IS THE ROLE OF JEWISH IN THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS, WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE ON THE INSTABILITY OF THE WORLD,,,,,,

    THEN U WILL UNDERSTAND. DONT JUST CLOSE ONE EYE……

    EVEN THOUGH I’M A MUSLIM, I STILL TRY TO STUDY CHRISTIAN, JUDAISM, AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND OTHER RELIGION.

    Comment published by APAYY on 27 March 2007.
    Was this a good comment?  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Post your opinion

Does your comment encourage responsible, intelligent discussion?

All comments are moderated for impersonations and defamatory, racially, sexually and religiously offensive content.

Subscribe without commenting

By the way... since you're sharing your comments, get paid for it.

 
FireStats iconPowered by FireStats