THE CICAK.com

If you liked this article, here are some related posts:

• Malaysian Bar Council demands Royal Commission investigate judicial scandal
• TODAYonline: Malaysian judiciary on trial
• Possible corruption scandal involving our Chief Justice
• About Tan Sri Ramon V. Navaratnam
• Register to vote now!

Responses || Discussion || Debates || Commentaries

1. Glad to see lawyers making a stand. But why do it when the PMs is away? Are they arfaid if he is around such crowds may disturb his daytime siesta?? Or is it a requirement that all demos must be held during the absence of PM?
   Anyway good to see the ppl stand up for once. By the way im amused at the large presence of PDRM. WOW amazing show of force to an over streched and overworked force, not enough manpower to curb crime but so much man power to deter lawyers. WHAT were they expecting the lawyers to turn amok or burn the jalaur gemilang??!!! baffling to say the least.

   Comment published by David Ng on 26 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +3

2. maybe they should rename it ” Palace of inJustice” ?? Why is it not in Bahasa Malaysia…wait Istana Keadilan???

   Comment published by Hisham Mohd Nor on 26 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +4

3. Wow…the march of a thousand liars…I mean, lawyers…

   Good for them. Zaid Ibrahim must be laughing at Nazri Aziz’s face.

   Comment published by Aput on 27 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     --2

4. I’m very impress…
   I believe every one of us (Malaysian) knew the true.

   Dear Malaysian,
   Is time to decide the future of our country.
   Don’t forget that you are the boss and you are the head of the leaders.
   Because you can decide the future of the “good” leaders that you choose.

   Don’t continue to make the same mistake again and again.

   You can change the future of your children and grand-child by make good with the vote that you only have once in 4-5 years.

   Malaysian, pls don’t get cheated by the hang tuah’s kris, the star in the “blur” and the kuncu-kuncu….

   by
   A Malaysian who still believe “this” goverment is hopeless

   Comment published by darren on 27 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +1

5. […] Protest: The Malaysian Bar Council demands Royal Commission … By Administrator A 2002 video recording was recently released by Parti Keadilan Rakyat’s de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, showing VK Lingam, a senior lawyer discussing the appointment of judges with a person alleged to be Chief Justice Ahmad … theCICAK - http://thecicak.com […]

   Comment published by Blogs Alert · Melayu Boleh on 27 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +0

6. got use meh???
   next day look like nth happen alrdy…
   i think not use at all…..

   Comment published by msn on 27 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     --2

7. it looks like nothing happened because government control the media

   http://www.jeffooi.com/2007/09/lameass_press_malaysias_chief.php

   Comment published by dan on 27 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +1

8. I guess there is a difference when PROFESSIONALS actually play a part in a protest. 1000 lawyers in a protest? That is something. The government has just to abide by the fact that more people can think nowadays and they are willing to walk the talk!
   Wake Up BN!

   Comment published by Kathy on 28 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +4

9. Bing Xuan, I hope that you will never give up hope and I want you to know that no matter where you are, I’ll be there just for you !! ^^

   Comment published by Kai Xin on 28 September 2007.
   Was this a good comment?     +0

10. As much as I’d like to share the enthusiasm of the bunch, allow me to be the sour one to point out that a march of a thousand lawyers will not do anything to change our country’s sorry stated judicial system.

    It’s like pointing out that the Million Man March in 1995 made much difference, it’s crap.

    If anything, we should wait and see what is the outcome of the supposed independent commission to investigate this issue, and if it is considered unreasonable or downright corrupt, then hold a march to show your discontent.

    Perhaps next we can read about how Maybank’s employees are protesting.

    Comment published by Aput on 1 October 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     --2

11. currently they’re investigating whether the video is real, or not. and i will offer my prediction on what will happen:

    they’ll (somehow) determine that the video is a fake.

    and then we can go back to grumbling.

    Comment published by star bright on 2 October 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

12. […] mass demonstration by lawyers last week in Putrajaya underlined the serious questions raised about the integrity of […]

    Comment published by TODAYonline: Malaysian judiciary on trial on 5 October 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

13. Dear Brothers and sisters,

    Allow me give you a quiz. If you can answer all this question, than you are qualify to be in the team of M’sia CSI.

    1. Do you know why they wanted to form their own Investigation Commission?
    2. Do you know qualification and background of these detectives?
    3. Why not just send the video to FBI like the other one?
    4. What is the motive of the government to investigate the source of the video?
    5. Have you ever see or heard that news that doctor did a brain operation for his own brain? Why we need external auditor to check companies’ account?

    Malaysian,
    Let’s see what these detectives will say.

    Let me predict the results:

    A. They will say the video is original and true, government will instruct all the judges to conduct micro sport-check at their houses and offices to ensure not video recorder or recording tools to ensure this kind of disclose and issue happen again.

    B. They will say the video is fake…. I don’t think so…..

    Comment published by Darren on 15 October 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

14. I read the report of this lawyers demonstartion when I landed in Beijing, China. It must be terrible to practice as a lawyer under false pretences. I totally empathise with the wretched feeling to be a lawyer in Malaysia, because as I said so often in my own blogg. (re http://yapchongyee.blogspot .com), Malaysia is lawless. I am not saying this because of what lawless behaviour of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali (copious reems of comments by me in my blog, but IN MALAYSIA YOU CANNOT POINT TO ANY PARTICULAR LAW PREVAILING AND SAY THAT THE CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACTIONS IS PROTECTED BY LAW AND LATER TO FIND THAT WHEN THE LAW IS IN ISSUE IN COURT THE JUDGE DOES THE EXACT OPPOSITE ALL DICTATED BY THE JUDGES’ WHIMS. The Law if there is any is unpredictable;therefore Malaysia is lawless.

    It is unheard off in all the world that a judge need not make the reasons for her judgment and order of court publicly known; and that is exactly what Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali thinks she has the right to do. In all the 9 years that my wife’s case has been in court and in all the orders made and injustice practised on us Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali has not delieved one word of a meaningful judgment.

    I will continue again later but go to my blogg. and read the sort of nonsense that comes out of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali.

    Comment published by yapchongyee on 21 November 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

15. I respectfully state and fully committed to defend my statement, THAT JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI” is not fully learned in the LAW to rimain s a judge of the court of appeal. Her dealing in my wife’s case (re: High Court, KL Petition No. D2-26-41 of 2001) which was struck out by Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali UNSUPPORTED BY LAW; HER ACTIONS WERE UNDERPINED BY HER IGNORANCE OF THE law. I WILL DEFEND MY STATEMENT IF SHE WILL OR THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA WILL COME TO PERTH TO APPLY FOR MY EXTRADICTION FOR CHARGING JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI FOR “CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR”.

    I Charge Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali with having aided & abetted Stephen Lim Cheng, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon to commit PERJURY & FORGERY & for PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE.

    I have written to the Chief Judge, High court of Malaya, President & Secretary of Malaysian Bar, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali the Malaysian Attorney andEmails to various and sundry lawyers of the Bar. I have also openly & publicly charged them with the same criminal offences; and these public statement expose me to criminal prosecution and therefore the Government

    Comment published by yapchongyee on 22 November 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

16. and judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and those said 3 criminals ALL HAVE CAUSES OF ACTION TO APPLY FOR MY EXTRATION ON CRIMINAL CHARGES, SO WHY DO YOU NOT DO SO ? mY DEFENCE IS TRUTH !

    I am charging the whole of the Malaysian LEGAL & Judiciary, for PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE so why do you not have NATIONAL PRIDE AND COME TO A COURT IN PERTH; where our Australian Judges are of the highest calibre and who cherish the highest standards of ethics and the law. I dare not face a Malaysian Court because I know that the Judge is moet probably “LIGHT” on the learning of the law.

    Please read my blog http:”yapchongyee.blogspot.com. I maintain not only that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is not only IGNORANT OF THE LAW BUT THAT SHE IS UNETHICAL, PROFESSIONALLY INCOMPETENT AND IS A LIAR (I had already stated this in my blog early in the piece.

    There is no law in Malaysia because the courts are not LAW BASED BUT DEPENDANT ON THE WHIMS OF THE JUDGES. You are better to retain the judges’”BAGMAN” rather than to retain a lawyer.

    Comment published by yapchongyee on 22 November 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

17. MALAYSIA IS 3RD RATE & 3RD WORLD.

    It is true that I am an Australian and it is equally true to say that I am a proud Australian; but why should I not be ? Australia is the best place to live because contrary to what lot of nonsense that prevails in Malaysia, Australia is not racist, unlike Malaysia. I was a Malaysian until 1978 when I migrated to Australia. I wanted a homeland that was free of racism; totally disgusted with what misery that pass for democracy, “MERITOCRACY”, whatever else that you Malays care to spin and claim as a Malaysia that is modern because you are not first world, you are bloody 3rd rate & 3rd world, lah !

    I do not obviously claim to have any positive sentiments for Malaysia, and I do not claim even to want to see a Malaysia that will progress towards a decent, morally upright civil society, because Malaysia is in truth an OLIGARCHY; which is described as government by “the few”. UMNO is not a Malay political party, because UMNO does not serve the Malay people; UMNO is only a political instrument to mislead the Rakyat to support the OLIGARCH; and who are the oligarch ? Look at the leadership of UMNO ! They are the sons & daughters of the original UMNO, the syed Albar, the Tun Husseins, the Tun Razaks, the Syed Albars and etc. These are oligarchs who live by their lies and keep the Malay rakyats in perpetual serfdom. The ordinary rakyat does not share in the fruits of the nation. What has the 50 years of Merdeka produced for the Malays ? Everything the same, lah ! Grinding poverty, perpetual debt, and this time do not blame the middle men, CHINESE as you are prome to do. The grinding poverty of the Malay rakyat is perpetuated by your so called “NEW ECONOMIC POLICY”. In truth you do take away from the Chinese & the Indians, but to be sure, you do not give it to the Malay rakyat, BUT YOU GIVE IT TO YOURSELF, THE OLIGARCH. The sons cousins, brothers of Tun Husseins, the Mahatirs, the Syed Albars etc.

    Has the New Economic Policy lifted the general conditions of the Malay rakyats ?
    NO ! Let me reveal the truth; why do I say that the rakyat does not get a “look in” to the benefits of Malaysia’s development if indeed there si any whatsoever. I read on the website of “the Malaysian Bar”, discussing the causes of the recent “HINDRAFF” that Malays hold 20% of the total shares, Indians 2% and Chinese 40%. I take these figures as merely hypothetical; however it is a starting point. I take the figure for the Malays of 20% for the sake of argument, therefore to get at the truth we need to ask ourselves, “HOW ARE THE 20% TO BE DEFINED ?” This forms the crux of the issue, because we can then see who and how the shares are held and from that we can say for sure whether the 20% is in truth held by the rakyat. Let me say it as the truth, because NOBODY IN MALAYSIA WILL DARE TO SAY AS IT IS. These 20% stake of the Malay share of the economic pie are in fact held by GOVERNMENT OWNED CORPORATION, as for example, “FELDA” “MALAYSIA AIRLINES” “SIME DARBY”; to the Malaysian Government and the Malays, these are deemed to be Malay. These are Malaysian Government Corporation and they are not really Malay owned at all. They are as much Chinese, Indians, or whatever owned as they are Malay owned, because the funds that purchased them come from the MALAYSIAN GOVERNMENT, and the Indians & Chinese are as much Malaysians as the Malays. This very crucial definition has been passed over because if the issue is raised the Malays threaten to take to rioting like in 1969.

    I praise HINDRAFF, the truly representative party for the Indians. The MIC is not representative of the Indians because it only makes their leaders very rich (1 or 2 maybe, and you know who). It is time that the Chinese too organize themselves into another Chinese version of the HINDRAFF. You cannot expect the Malay oligarch to deliver into your fucking Chinese laps reforms that will take away their golden goose; you will need to agitate for reforms as the Indians have so courageously dared to demand their fair share of the economic pie.

    I would like to observe that our Chinese people are gutless. There is forever only one weapon for change and that is to PUT PRESSURE ON THE GOVERNMENT; and the only pressure that will cause pain for the government is to shut down the economy by civil disobedience; learn from “Ghandigi”, take to the streets. The Malays have always threatened us with Malay RIOTS, and it has always been effective, so why not use their own weapons against them ? Chinese must join with HINDRAFF and break away from the MCA; they are like the MIC, theyr look after themselves and leave the ordinary Chinese holding their own balls in their palms.

    Comment published by YAPCHONGYEE on 30 November 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +1

18. Dear Friends (reporters of Singapore ST.Times)

    I am sending to all of you copy of my latest letter to the CHIEF JUDGE OF MALAYSIA to draw his attention to the sort of nonsense that pass for their administration of the judicial & legal process. I have a grivence against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Malaysian Court of Appeal. I set up my own blog site at http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com to NAME AND SHAME this judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, because she acted criminally. READ MY BLOG because my story is too long.

    I hope you all will help to spread my letters to show every one how shameful and comical the Malaysian judiciary is.

    Yap Chong Yee,
    5a Prinsep Road,
    Attadale, W. Australia,
    Date :
    To,
    The President,
    Court of Appeal,
    Putra Jaya, Malaysia,

    Your Honour (YAA),

    Re :KL High Court Originating Petition No. : D2-26-41-2001
    Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & 5 others.

    I charge Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali of the Malaysian Court of Appeal for acting in conspiracy with my wife’s solicitors, M/s Lim & Hoh of Ming Building, Bukit Nanas, Kuala Lumpur to cause my wife’s said above petition to be CONDEMNED & CONSIGNED to the legal limbo of the Court of Appeal.

    My charge against Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for acting in conspiracy with my wife’s solicitor M/s Lim & Hoh to pervert the course of justice, and for the purpose of protecting three criminals respondents of the said petition namely, Wong Kem Chen, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban & Kwong Sea Yoon from Prosecution for PERJURY & FORGERY, perverting the course of justice, fraud, obtaining money by false pretenses, fabricating evidence and other criminal offences.

    Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali perpetrated these criminal offences by knowingly refusing leave for the petitioner to cross examine said 3 criminal respondents for perjury, AND THEN TO AWARD TO RESPONDENTS TWO ORDERS (1) ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AS THE FIRST ORDER and then (2)ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT SAID PETITION AFTER THE RESPONDENTS HAD EXECUTED & ENFORCED THEIR ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS, by the respondents accepting the payment of RM.60,000

    Please take note that Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali HAD AWARDED THE ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AHEAD OF THE ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT. This fact confirmed the execution & enforcement of the order for security for costs BY THE RESPONDENTS & by JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI. Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali knowing that after petitioner had paid the sum of RM.60,000 being the security for costs she ordered, an open court hearing of the petition will follow as a matter of course and this hearing will cause the said 3 criminals to be cross examined FOR perjury & forgery, and hence face criminal prosecution. It was upon payment by petitioner of the security for costs that caused the respondents to apply for striking out of said petition; and Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, being fully aware of these circumstances proceeded to prevent this from developing by awarding to respondents THE FURTHER ORDER TO STRIKE OUT PETITION. Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali knows that although she had no power to award her 2nd order for striking out, the respondents having executed & enforced their order for security for costs, awarded the order for striking out anyway, KNOWING THAT HER ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT WILL CONSIGN & CONDEMN THE FATE OF SAID PETITION TO THE LIMBO OF TIMELESSNESS.

    My charge against my wife’s solicitors M/s Lim & Hoh is that they did not oppose respondents’ application for striking out of petition. My wife’s solicitors wrote to us complaining that every time I wrote officially to complain of the misconduct of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali , SHE WOULD haul up Mr David Hoh, my wife’s counsel to her office to face her. It is for this reason that I conclude that Mr. David Hoh had been instructed not to oppose respondents’ application for striking out said petition. I do not believe that all the parties namely, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, together with the criminal behaviour of Stephen Lim & Wong kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon, the lawyers of M/s Annad & Noraini (solicitors) respondent applicants’ solicitors who represented respondents in their application for the order for striking out, and who committed subornation of perjury in their preparation of the affidavit of Stephen Lim Cheng Ban that supported their application for striking out of petition because the signatures on the documents that were annexed to the affidavit of respondent Stephen Lim Cheng ban even merely at a glance when compared to my wife’s true signature affixed to her many affidavits will show obvious & glaring differences and therefore cannot be taken to have been the true signature of my wife’s..

    The ACTION OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI to award her order for striking out to the respondents was not due to her obvious professional INCOMPETENCE. She had to have encouraged M/s Annad & Noraini (solicitors for the respondents), to proceed to apply for striking out with her obvious support, and to instruct Mr David Hoh not to oppose respondents’ application for striking out said petition. For the respondents to succeed in their application to strike out, it COULD ONLY be achieved by the conspiracy of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali leading the other co conspirators of M/s Annad & Noraini committing SUBORNATION OF PERJURY & abetting forgery & fabrication of evidence, and for Mr David Hoh, under the influence of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali TO NOT OPPOSE RESPONDENTS’ APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT. It is too much to ask me to believe that all of these PROFESSIONAL LAWYERS CAN OVER LOOK THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES ALL & I MEAN ALL THESE LAWYERS CAN TOGETHER NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING ?

    The two opposing orders for an order for security for costs followed by an order for striking out cannot be made by any SANE JUDGE hearing the petition because a COURT OF JUSTICE OF LAW & EQUITY JUST CANNOT MAKE SUCH NONSENSE ORDERS; one order says “YES”, and at the same time the other ORDER says “NO”.

    There is the not so often used criminal offence & of tort OF MALFEASANCE, I have already written on this offence in my blog. However, an officer of the court commits malfeasance when he/she omits to do WHAT IS REQUIRED OF HIM/HER TO DO BY LAW AND SUCH omission CAUSE DAMAGE OR LOSS TO THE INDIVIDUAL. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali committed malfeasance BECAUSE SHE IS BOUND BY LAW,(having first enforced her order for security for costs at the behest of the 3 criminals Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Kwong Sea Yoon & Wong Kem Chen.) AND UPON PETITIONER HAVING PAID SAID RM.60,000 WAS REQUIRED BY THE RULES OF THE HIGH COURT TO ORDER A HEARING OF THE PETITION AND SHE OMMITTED TO ALLOW THE HEARING OF THE PETITION. The penalty for malfeasance is dismissal from her judgeship and of course open to be sued in tort.

    My research tells me that proof of intention to commit malfeasance is not required. The fact that defendant omitted to do what is required by law for her to do constitutes the offence. Having discussed the point, I will charge Mr David Hoh with Malfeasance because he too omitted to apply to strike out respondents’ application for striking out said petition; not to mention that I will sue him for damages for negligence & malfeasance.

    Yours faithfully

    Yapchongyee

    Copy :
    (1)Attorney General’s Dept., (2) President & Secretary Malaysian Bar Council
    (3)M/s Lim & Hoh (by fax) (4)Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali (Ct. of App.)
    (5)E-mail to all and sundry of the Malaysian Bar

    Comment published by yapchongyee on 9 December 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0

19. Reply to Mr David Hoh’s Letter Published in MALAYSIA TODAY WEBSITE on 1st July at 20.40 hours

    Mr David Hoh, my wife’s solicitor has written a whole lot of irelevant TRASH, and you will say “of course that is what you would say, “ but I wrote in my blog (please refer) that I fear that David Hoh may further compromise my wife’s petition against those criminals Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon and TAKE NOTICE THAT , I HAVE PUBLICLY CHARGED JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI FOR ACTING IN CONSPIRACY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE AND JOINTLY WITH THE LEGAL FIRM OF M/s ANNAD & NORAINI, (SOLICITORS FOR STEPHEN LIM & WONG KEM CHEN) and IT IS MY CHARGE AGAINST Mr David Hoh FOR JOINTLY AND WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTING IN CONSPIRACY WITH JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI AND IN THE ONLY MANNER THAT COULD ACHIEVE THE PRETEXT FOR JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI TO ILLEGALLY & WRONGFULLY ACT ( WITHOUT ANY UNDERPINNING SANCTION BY ANY LAW PREVAILING IN MALAYSIA ); Mr David Hoh made it possible for Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to strike out said petition WHEN HE WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT FAILURE BY PETITIONER TO DEFEND AGAINST RESPONDENT STEPHEN LIM’S APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT WILL AS A MATTER OF LAW REQUIRE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI TO ORDER STRIKE OUT MY WIFE’S PETITION, THE WITHHOLDING BY Mr DAVID HOH (acting as my wife’s solicitor) AND Mr David had INTENTIONALLY withheld filing a DEFENSE TO STEPHEN LIM’S APLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT. THIS GAVE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI “THE FUCKING FIG LEAF PRETEXT TO STRIKE OUT SAID PETITION.

    THE CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND THE LAW BY THE JOINT ENTERPRISE OF M/s ANNAD & NORAINI, Mr David Hoh and that mudhead judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali IS TESTIMONY OF THE THIRD WORLD SHAMBLES IN THE MALAYSIAN LEGAL FRATERNITY, JUDICIARY & ADMINISTRATION.

    I have reproduced the most damaging portion of David’s(SO HE THINKS) charge against me; AND I WILL STATE OUTRIGHT THAT HE IS STATING WHATEVER HAPPENED BETWEEN ME, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI TRULY; AND I INVITE HIM TO REPRODUCE ON MALAYSIA TODAY ALL MY LETTERS OF APOLOGY SO THAT THE WORLD CAN READ IT. I can say it with honesty that I do not know how to lie without embarrassment; I JUST DO NOT LIE ! Yes ! I apologised to Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali BUT I SAY TO DAVID HOH TO EXHIBIT THE LETTERS ON MALAYSIA TODAY ! Fucking Fair or not ?

    This is the story behind my so called apology to judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali; it is all comic opera.

    THE STORY OF JOE YAP’S APOLOGY TO JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI

    ORIGINAL LETTERS WILL BE EXHIBITED BY DAVID HOH WITH CONSENT OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI

    Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali at the first hearing of my wife’s petition (hereinafter to be refered to as the petition) requested Mr David Hoh to ask my wife if she will withdraw her application to cross examine THE THREE MUSKETEERS, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon FOR PERJURY ! I spoke to my old classmate Judge Mokhtar Sideen of the FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA; David knew this. I complained to Justice Mokhtar that the conduct of Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali with highly irregular, unethical and very suspect BUT I TOLD MOKHTAR SIDEEN NOT TO INTERFERE IN ANY WAY AT ALL. I merely cite this example to put in context that what Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali had INDEED ACTED IMPROPERLY & UNETHICALLY. Mr Justice Mokhtar Sideen advised me not to withdraw the application whose advice we acted on and the application to cross examine the three Musketeer criminals was allowed to stand.

    JUDGE Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, PURSUANT TO our decision to stay the application for cross-examination PUT THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PETITION INTO A 4 YEAR LIMBO and at the end of the 4 years hiatus she made the order for security for costs of RM.60,000 (in any court in the world such an order will be made in 5 minutes as a matter of course).

    Returning to my naration of my story; having suspected that the conduct of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali in the circumstances SMELT OF CORRUPTION, I went to KL without the knowledge of Mr DAVID Hoh and I wrote a letter to Chief Justice Fairoz, complaining the improper conduct of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. I had personally hand delivered the letter to the office of CJ Fairoz. I want it be known that CJ Fairoz was also my classmate at Singapore Law School, BUT I DID NOT AT ANY TIME CONTACTED PERSONALLY OR ASKED ANY FAVOURS. I HAD DELIVERED THE LETTER TO CJ ST 10 O”CLOCK IN THE MORNING BUT IN THE EVENING OF THE SAME DAY AT 4 O’CLOCK I GOT A PHONE CALL FROM DAVID ASKING ME TO ATTEND HIS OFFICE UNDER SOME PRETEXT. I had wondered how he got to know that I was in town ? However I had never suspected that JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI HAD CONTACTED HIM. However I agreed to meet with him at his office in the morning.

    He told me at his office that CJ was very mad at Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and that for the sake of her career I ought to withdraw my letter under some pretext. That was at the earliest days of the petition proceedings. I told David that I will not withdraw the letter of complaint to the CJ because the incident did take place and it was highly improper not to mention that such conduct was highly unethical. To cut to the chase I told David that I do not agree to his persuation BUT THAT I WILL SIGN THE LETTER PREPARED BY HIM; BUT THAT I WILL NOT READ THE CONTENTS AND THAT I WILL WHEN IT BECAME RELEVANT RELATE THE FACTS & CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE LETTER. I am not want to shirk my responsibility arising from my actions. Yes I singed the letter of apology and all the consequences arising from it.

    Having accepted my responsibilities under the letter; let me tell you how that letter was written ! I went into David’s office at 10 o’clock in the morning. When I agreed to do as what has been related above, David’s father Mr Frank Hoh, who was also my classmate at Law School engaged me in TRIVIA CONVERSATION, sort of SHOOTING THE BREEZE ! while David was on the telephone in conversation with Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, “putting the heads together to come up with the contents of the letter that I was to sign. To this day I do not know what was written in that letter. I would like to know when David publish that letter. FUN ! FUN ! FUN! A bit of forensic detection is possible here to find out who really composed that letter by the language of the letter, because everyone of us have our own style and semantics and this produces the individual characteristics of the writer. Let us see who wrote. For sure you will find that it was not written by me. Try this ! It is FUN FUN FUN !

    It is not necessary to relate all because it is boring to read too long a narative; but if David the Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali or anyone who has been named in this narative finds that he has something THAT HE FUCK ME FOR he can write to my blog or to Malaysia Today. There is no need for me to read the long letter that David has written; but let me just say that I DO NOT EVEN NEED TO READ HIS LETTER BECAUSE HIS CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY LIES IN HIS NOT PUTTING A DEFENCE TO THE NONSENSE APPLICATION BY STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN FOR STRIKING OUT. That criminal offence under the common law (MALAYSIAN LAW AS WELL) that David is liable for is the criminal offence of MALFEASANCE and David is in the same boat as Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali because Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali too is similarly liable for the criminal offence of MALFEASANCE. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali & Mr David Hoh if you want to FUCK ME come to Perth whe the Law is truly practised by our judges ni the highest level of excellence and respect for ethics & tradition.

    I HAVE REPRODUCED ONLY THE RELEVANT PART OF DAVID’S LETTER BELOW, IF YOU WANT TO READ THE REST GO TO THE ARCHIEVES OF MALAYSIA TODAY.

    RELEVANT PART OF DAVID’S LETTER TO MALAYSIA TODAY, BELOW :

    B. Yap Chong Yee’s letters of Apology to YA Dato’ Zainun Ali and to the Judiciary.
    0. In the past, Yap Chong Yee, the husband had written apologies to YA Dato’ Zainun Ali and to the Chief Justice Malaysia both dated 8.6.2006 for his earlier letters criticizing the Judge.
    C. Yap Chong Yee’s letter to Malaysia Today dated 7.2.2007
    0. (i) We have written to Mdm Lim Choi Yin, the Petitioner on 30.4.2007 to ask if she shared Yap Chong Yee’s views as stated in his letter dated 7.2.2007 to Malaysia Today.
    0. (ii) On 11.5.2007 the Petitioner expressly replied to us and categorically stated that she does not agree to his views and that she was immediately revoking the Power of Attorney that he allegedly held on her behalf concerning this case and she later agreed to allow our Mr. David Hoh to show her letter dated 11.5.2007 to the Judge.
    0. D. While we make no comment on the reasons of the Learned Judge in coming to her decisions striking out the Petition (which are under Appeal), we do not subscribe to Yap Chong Yee’s personal views concerning the Learned Judge nor do we believe that the Learned Judge had acted improperly nor shown any criminal conduct in this action. Further, according to the Notes of Proceedings, the various hearings had been adjourned due to inter alia various reasons such as for filing affidavits in reply, illness and/or filing written submissions.
    We feel it unfair that Yap Chong Yee a once practicing lawyer has launched such a savage attack on the Judge who cannot by her office defend herself. In litigious matters, there is always a victor and loser. For the loser in our legal system, there is an appeal process which the Petitioner has subscribed to and to which we wait for the Petitioner’s appeal to be heard. If the Judge had erred, we believe that justice would surely prevail. ? ? ?

    Yours faithfully,
    Messrs Lim & Hoh
    Kuala Lumpur.

    01/07 20:40:48

    Yap Chong Yee says : MY FUCKING LETTER IS TOO LONG SO I WILL NOT BOTHER TO PROOF READ. Forgive for the mistakes but within comtext you know what I meant to say.

    Comment published by yapchongyee on 10 December 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +1

20. The Malay UMNO leaders have learned to “spin” and project a feel good factor into their public statements relating to their most diabolical projects and making them appear to be advantageous to their intended victims (their minority races). The Americans and the NAZIS are masters of this art (created by Dr Goebbels, Nazis Propaganda Minister and spin was the Nazis tool to implement Hitler’s holocaust and the eradication of the Jews in Europe); as for example George W. Bush had secret plans to attack Iraq and steal Iraqi oil, the Pentagon spin doctors put out a barrage of public statements that Saddam was a beast & dictator and had to be removed for the good of the Iraqi people. This is spin concealing their true evil purpose behind sweet words that are aimed at masking the evil behind the words.

    I just heard “Syed Albar” explain that the Malaysian Government is very reluctant to abuse their Internal Security Act, to jail activists as they had done to Hindraff leaders. This is the most diabolical spin if ever I heard one. The Malaysian Government had at the drop of a hat would resort to the excesses of the ISA for the slightest of excuse. I remember how the Government abused the ISA to jail willy nilly 2 bit gansters. I had last night visitors from KL for dinner and the discussion veered to the Hindraff riot and the jailing of their leaders for attempted MURDER ? This is the height of the abuse of the Law. The truth is the Malaysian Government are never accountable; they do as they please.

    Coming back to our dinner discussion, my guests tells me and I can see the sense in their point of view; that the Hindraff Riot was a peaceful demonstration BUT THAT THE POLICE WERE INSTRUCTED TO PROVOKE A VIOLENT REACTION. Why did the police acted in the manner (with violent water cannons laced with dangerous chemicals; and tear gas grenades). IF YOU CARE TO EXAMINE THE VIDEO OF THE POLICE RESPONSE, YOU WOULD FIND THAT IT WAS THE POLICE THAT CAUSED FEAR & CHAOS, firing into unarmed & totally helpless Indians who were out to demonstrate their dire economic DUES as citizens of Malaysia. The did not deserve such callous and overly harsh abuse by armed police who bludgeoned them to within an inch of their lives. My guests were correct in their assessment of the brutality of police over reaction; UMNO leaders planned to cause the ILLUSION OF POLITICAL UP HEAVAL SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE THE OPTION TO DELAY THE UPCOMING ELECTION SET FOR 2009 BECAUSE DATO ANWAR IBRAHIM WILL BE FREE TO CONTEST THE ELECTION. I truly believe that if the indications on the Malaysian political scene was that UMNO will not win they will use the excuse of the Hindaff riot to impose EMERGENCY AND POSTPONE THE ELECTION.

    Consider this proposition, how is it that UMNO is able to govern Malaysia for the last 50 years, WHEN UMNO IS UNABLE TO WIN IN ELECTIONS IN KELANTAN & TRENGGANU (both predominantly Malay constituencies ) ? I do not believe that support from both MIC & MCA (both ethnic parties are not representative of Indian & Chinese support). In the MIC I do not believe that Sammy Vellu has the genuine support of the Indians, hence this riot demonstrates that he does not have their support. In the MCA, their leadership too is all self serving and the MCA does not truly represent Chinese interests. Both the MIC & MCA are retained by UMNO to give the semblance of across the board support of all the communities that make up Malaysian society BUT IN TRUTH THE GOVERNMENT DISHONESTLY MANIPULATES THE BOLLOT BOXES AS SHOWN IN THE RECENT ELECTION IN KUALA SELANGOR.

    I had earlier written a letter posted on my blogg (re: http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com that Malaysia is not a democracy at all, but an oligarchy, the government has been by the same few families. This is where I am stating my point that Malay UMNO leaders have learned to “SPIN” and under the cover of spin they project the illusion that the government is an elected one when in truth the election of UMNO is by trickery, by ballot box stuffing. ALL MALAYSIANS MSUT WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA RETAINS POWER BY FRAUD. It serves no one in Malaysia be they Malays or Chinese or Indians. A nation is only as strong as when all thei people work together for equal rights & equal opportunities. I am not writing and arguing for equal rights for the Chinese, because I believe that our Chinese are better off migrating to Australia. I have also written in my last letter that the number of Chinese remains relatively the same number of 4.5 million at the time of Merdeka; this means that there has been very substantial emigration from Malaysia, most to Singapore. I am also not interested to put up suggestions for the improvement of Malaysia, That is something that nobody can do because it is already the mind set of the Malays that they are the superior race and that Malaysia belong to the Malays; but who is to say NO ? On the other hand IF THE MALAYS ARE SO SUPERIOR, WHY DO THEY STILL NOW NEED AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONS ? This shows that the Malays are an inferior race, and they cannot survive if left to fend for themselves.

    It is sad that of the 24 million Malays only a handful have it all for the lest 50 years and yet they are unable to advance in real terms. The Malays of today is as deprived as they were and still are deprived today. I ask UMNO how many of the Malays have advanced in real terms today as they were 50 years ago. Yes ! There are many Malays living in the modern towns like PJ, BUT WHAT IS MORE TELLING OF THE TRUE SITUATION IS THE QUESTION, HOW MANY MORE OF THE 24 MILLION LIVE IN THE COUNTRY ? That is the more important question. From my perspective the true count of Malays benefiting from the NEP are the bureaucrats; and that could only be in the hundreds of thousands (NOT EVEN IN THE FUCKING 1 MILLION); then the question that follows is, what has happened to the other 23 million Malays rakyat living in the Kampongs ? What have to got out of voting for UMNO ? NOTHING, not a fucking thing. The true Malay rakyat has still to awaken to the fraud perpetrated by their UMNO, the Malay Party and spinner of fine hearing tales of the BOUNTY OF PLENTY THAT COME FROM DEPRIVING THE CHINESE & INDIANS.

    My perspective is for the races of Malaysia to abolish the UMNO ploy of racism that do nothing for everybody else except to the sole benefit of UMNO leaders. I will write in my next letter to argue that it is time for all the races to abolish affirmative action because it benefits only the very, very few in UMNO. It is time to change Malaysian leaders and support the OPPOSITION; what UMNO tell the Malays are an ILLUSION.

    MY NEXT LETTER after I show you what an illiterate in LAW that dumb arsehole this so called FEDERAL COURT JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI IS.

    Comment published by yapchongyee on 14 December 2007.
    Was this a good comment?     +0